Saturday, January 29, 2011

OK tata bye-bye by Pushi Chowdhry


While most surnames in India reflect caste and lineage, the Parsis had a delightfully modern streak — having landed without caste, history and context, they created identities through professions and urban streets.
Our family moved to Bombay (now Mumbai) from Rawalpindi in 1947. We came as refugees but the family soon settled and by 1953 my father had restarted playing golf at the Willingdon Club. I was eight years old and would walk 18 holes with him every Saturday and Sunday. The three Parsi gentlemen who made up his regular four-ball were “uncles” Poonawala, Coorlawala and Colabawala. Very soon they had rechristened my father Pindiwala.
Uncle Colabawala did not live in Colaba but in a penthouse on Malabar Hill. May be his ancestors had lived in Colaba. I used to spend hours searching the telephone directory to find Parsi surnames and building up stories around their families.
There was prohibition in Bombay those days. So to get liquor you had to find Mr Dalal, who would introduce you to Mr Daruwala, who in turn would get bottles delivered to your home by Mr Batliwala who would be accompanied by Mr Sodawaterbottleopenerwalla (the longest Parsi surname I have come across).
Other surnames whose ancestors were in the beverages trade were Mr Fountainwala, Mr Ginwala, Mr Rumwala, Mr Sodawala and Mr Jhunjhunwala.
We used to have two delightful Siamese kittens in our flat and these were gifted to my mother by her friend Mrs Billimoria. My mother spent hours knitting cardigans for them, with wool she bought from the Unwala family.
My uncle ran the air force canteen in Cotton Green and his partner, yes you guessed it, was Mr Canteenwala. They had this fantastic cook, Mr Bhajiwala. Their mild and meek manager, Mr Jeejeebhoy, nodded his head and agreed with everything everybody said.
My grandfather was the Sheriff of Bombay. I think the first and only Sikh to hold this position. Being Sheriff it was only natural that he had Mr Bandookwala and Mr Golimarwala as his constant companions.
Grandfather had many Parsi friends who were in politics. There was this squeaky clean khadi-clad Mr Ghandy, and the not so clean Mr Kalaghandy — who was invariably being hounded by Mr Kotwal. But he never left home without his “friends” Mr Barrister, Mr Vakil, Mr Lawyer and their munshi Mr Mehnty.
My grandfather built Hotel Waldorf on Arthur Bunder Road in Colaba. So for this he naturally used the services of Mr Contactor and Mr Mistry. He never went to the “native” moneylenders when short of money, but borrowed it from his Parsi friend Mr Readymoney.
Our neighbour and family physician was Dr Adi Doctor — he was only half a doctor. He lived with his in laws Mr and Mrs Pochkhanawala. My sister swears they ate only poached eggs for breakfast.
I remember going to Dr Doctor’s sister’s wedding. She married Mr Screwala. What he did for a living, I do not know to this day. If you are in Mumbai maybe you can track him down in the yellow or pink pages.
Jokes apart, there is a lesson for all of us here: imagine if we could christen our politicians through democratic vote: Jinnahwalla, Nikarwalla, Icequeen, Motawalla! It would really be able to keep everyone in check, where individuals and media didn’t only control your public profile but also your public identity.
The Parsis have taught us that if you take serious interest in satire, you can change the world! My name today is Comedymanifestowalla!

Source: The Tribune, Chandigarh, India.
If you are interested to read about India and its history, check the following:


Pakistan sans NRO. Status quo unlikely to change soon by Syed Nooruzzaman


When the Pakistan Supreme Court scrapped the infamous National Reconciliation Ordinance (NRO), it was thought that the days of President Asif Ali Zardari were numbered. Major changes in the composition of the PPP-led coalition government were also expected because of the revival of corruption cases against the Interior Minister, the Defence Minister and many others. But as the situation prevails today, the NRO verdict is unlikely to lead to the consequences as seen initially. Mr Zardari and the two ministers are showing no signs of looking for the exit door.
Addressing a gathering at Naudero on December 27, 2009, on the occasion of Benazir Bhutto’s second death anniversary, Mr Zardari warned all those who wanted him to resign after the apex court judgement, “Don’t think that we are weak, or we cannot fight.” He had been in jail for over 11 years. He indicated that he was not afraid of going to jail again. But his view was that Pakistan needed him to be in President’s House, and he would stay put there. Obviously, he will prefer to use all the resources available to him, including the constitutional provision providing him immunity against court cases, to remain the President of Pakistan for as long as he can.
 Mr Zardari is trying to project him and his party’s government as the defenders of democracy, which has been brought back on the rails with great sacrifices made by different sections of society. He has sought to convey the impression that he is not for a confrontation between the presidency and the judiciary, which, many believe, may happen if the NRO verdict is not implemented in letter and spirit. In his speech, there was an indirect hint to the judiciary that it should avoid pressing the matter too much because that might weaken the forces of democracy. The beneficiaries in that situation will be the extremist elements trying to subvert the system by using violent means.
 The threat to stability posed by the Taliban and other extremist elements has, in fact, proved to be a blessing in disguise for Mr Zardari and those on his bandwagon. Many political analysts have been arguing that any attempt to unseat Mr Zardari will be an invitation to instability and chaos, which Pakistan cannot afford today.
 Interestingly, there is talk of “reconciliation” between the Zardari camp and those who want him to pack off and leave President’s House. Mr Zardari is being advised to initiate a process for the removal of the 17th amendment to the 1975 Constitution, which gives power to the President to dissolve the national and provincial assemblies and to sack an uncooperative government. He is also being urged to improve the government’s functioning to acquire a new and better image.
Even PML (N) leader Nawaz Sharif is not speaking as forcefully as he ought to for the implementation of the apex court’s NRO ruling. Addressing a meeting of his party last Saturday, he asked the government to bring back the money stacked in Swiss banks by Pakistanis (an indirect reference to Mr Zardari’s overseas bank accounts). But his statement is interpreted as being aimed at mainly silencing his critics, who allege that his party is playing the role of a “friendly” opposition. The former Prime Minister has refrained from issuing a threat to launch a drive for the implementation of the apex court verdict. The language he uses nowadays is different from that of the days when he fought for the restoration of the judiciary’s pre-November 2007 status.
Efforts are on to prove that the judgement reflects the judges’ bias against the PPP and Sindh province. The verdict is also being interpreted as aimed at targeting certain individuals — read Mr Zardari. The PPP leadership says it will not take the matter lying down.
 The newspapers and TV channels trying to create an atmosphere in which the tainted politicians can find it difficult to survive in their present positions are being targeted by the government. Some ruling politicians have approached the authorities in Dubai to ban TV talk shows lampooning the corrupt in Pakistan. The journalists who have been very harsh in their criticism of the corrupt politicians are being dubbed as “Israeli agents”.
Mr Zardari is not in the good books of the Pakistan Army, yet top generals have not hinted at being in a hurry to get him replaced. Any attempt to show the PPP co-chairperson the door is feared to lead to dangerous consequences. Such a course may result in a split in the PPP, throwing the government out of gear. That is why neither the Army nor Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani, enjoying the confidence of the armed forces, wants to take any step that may disturb the present political dispensation.
Mr Gilani may have improved his image considerably since he took over as Prime Minister after the 2008 elections, but he is not in a position to carry along with him the entire PPP. He is fully aware of these harsh realities. The status quo also suits the second major partner in the ruling coalition, the MQM.
There is the possibility of Mr Nawaz Sharif emerging as the major gainer if somehow Mr Zardari has to relinquish power. The PML (N) has been invited again to rejoin the coalition it left soon after the formation of the government in 2008. But there is no positive response from Mr Sharif. Perhaps, he is waiting for the government to fall under the wait of its own problems. But this is unlikely to come about soon as efforts are to get Mr Zardari’s name cleared of all corruption charges levelled against him when Mr Sharif was Prime Minister.
The Pakistan President’s supporters strongly believe that it was vindictive politics that led to the framing of corruption cases against him. Much, however, depends on how far the Establishment is successful in influencing the Supreme Court of Pakistan, particularly when the very eligibility of Mr Zardari to become the President has been questioned.
Mr Zardari, however, appears to be confident of weathering the storm he faces today. He has been asserting that he can defeat the game-plan of his opponents with the help of law. Mr Zardari’s camp followers want the judiciary to keep in mind that if the situation further deteriorates, it will be curtains for democracy again. After all, how long can the Pakistan Army resist the temptation of recapturing power?

Source: The Tribune, Chandigarh, India.
If you are interested to read about India and its history, check the following:


A heinous crime. Australia must ensure students’ safety

While it is not yet clear whether the killing of Punjabi youth Nitin Garg in Melbourne is a racial or criminal act, Australia has gained notoriety for racial attacks on foreign students and the latest brutality will be seen in that context. Indian students who work at night to self-finance their studies fall easy prey to attacks by armed hoodlums who roam freely on the streets of Melbourne and other cities. The External Affairs Minister, Mr S.M. Krishna, has rightly conveyed to the Australian authorities the “deep anger” in India over the abominable act and warned that such incidents could vitiate the atmosphere of trust between the two countries.
Australia’s Deputy Prime Minister Julia Gillard has denied that it was a racial attack. It is not enough for her to portray Australia as “a nation that overwhelmingly is an open, tolerant, multi-cultural, welcoming society” unless such incidents are stopped with a firm hand. The Australian government’s response to growing racial attacks on foreign students does not inspire hope. Even the latest law, which empowers the Victorian police to search for weapons without a warrant at designated spots, is a delayed and inadequate reaction to the growing lawlessness, conveniently blamed on layoffs caused by the global financial meltdown.
By taking a soft stance over the mistreatment of overseas students, Australia is only hurting itself. Its reputation as “a welcoming and accepting country” for international students stands tarnished. Education used to be a thriving industry in Australia. No longer so. The quality of education provided by unscrupulous, so-called vocational colleges has cost international students dear and hurt Australia’s image. More than 70,000 Indian students studied in Australia in 2009. For the coming session there is a 21 per cent drop in visa applications. Fears about personal safety have largely forced students to look for other destinations of higher education. 
Source: The Tribune, Chandigarh, India.
If you are interested to read about India and its history, check the following:


Unworthy of medals. But dirty cops should also get due punishment

The Union Home Ministry’s decision to strip former Haryana DGP SPS Rathore of his President’s Police Medal following his conviction in the Ruchika molestation case will be some consolation for the right-thinking people who were appalled at the disrepute to which he brought the police force through his unbecoming conduct. The withdrawal will be a stern warning to other tainted officials as well. The ministry may recommend withdrawal of police medals from all persons convicted for moral turpitude or any act that brought disrespect to the police force, or any officer who was dismissed from the service for his act that brought disrepute to the police. Several officers may also be stripped of their police awards.
While the loss of medals may be a disgrace for men like Rathore, what is all the more important is that they get due punishment. Only that can act as a deterrent against misuse of their position. They are given authority to protect the public, not to shield themselves. In fact, the way Rathore connived with other powerful politicians and policemen to make life hell for the family of Ruchika and that of her friend Aradhana makes his being free on bail a risky proposition.
The convict is making much of the so-called media trial. What he is forgetting is that the media is only pleading that there should be a fair trial, which he had circumvented ruthlessly. If he and others like him had not made a mockery of justice, the media would not have come into the picture at all. There is need to put in place a mechanism that men like him are not able to take the justice delivery system for a ride. He had the entire might of the state with him. What is wrong with the media sympathising with the distraught families who underwent a nightmare for 19 long years? 

Source: The Tribune, Chandigarh, India.
If you are interested to read about India and its history, check the following:


Escape of terrorists. It reflects poorly on police functioning


Three Pakistani terrorists giving the slip to a lone policeman escorting them in Delhi last Friday and five police officers caught in camera dancing at a party hosted by an underworld don in Mumbai underlines the extent of the rot that has set in in the system. Can the country fight the terrorist menace successfully or handle the mafia groups if the police force takes its work so non-seriously or possibly even colludes with them? The three Pakistanis, who had served their jail terms for working as ISI agents and abetting terrorist strikes in India, were to be deported soon. When they complained of some eye problem, an Indian Reserve Battalion Sub-Inspector was asked to take them to a hospital. The terrorists gave the security personnel the slip while they were taking food in a restaurant after an eye check-up. It is surprising why only one policeman was assigned the task of getting the eyes of the terrorists examined by a doctor? Shamefully, he, too, took the responsibility given to him in a casual manner.
Clearly, the three terrorists virtually having been allowed to disappear is a major security lapse. But who is responsible for this? What is there in the Home Ministry’s enquiry report is yet to be made public. Blame game, which has been going on between the Foreign Regional Registration Office and the Special Branch of the Delhi Police, will not do. It is not difficult to find out the officials guilty of not taking their job with utmost seriousness when it involved handling convicted terrorists. The guilty must be given the harshest punishment possible. The terrorists at large pose a serious threat to security in the country. They must be nabbed before they indulge in what they are trained for.
The two incidents — one in Delhi and other in Mumbai — call for a thorough overhaul of the police functioning. How can the police discharge its onerous responsibilities honestly and effectively when some of its officials face the charge of being part of a nexus involving mafia dons? The five police personnel, including a Deputy Commissioner of Police, have been suspended. But this is not enough. They must be removed from service if the enquiry ordered into the episode establishes their link with criminal gangs.  
 
Source: The Tribune, Chandigarh, India.
If you are interested to read about India and its history, check the following:


Delhi Durbar. Arun Jaitley cuts a sorry figure

Feroze Shah Kotla Ground in Delhi has suddenly earned tremendous notoriety when the India-Sri Lanka one-day cricket match had to be abandoned due to a bad pitch. This has naturally turned everybody’s attention to the role of the DDCA office-bearers, more so its president, who is none other than the Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha and the BJP’s spin doctor, Arun Jaitley.
Every time journalists visit his room while a cricket match is on, which these days is the rule rather than an exception, Jaitley is busy watching the match on his TV screen.
Just before the winter session of Parliament ended, Jaitley in his passion for the game organised a match between MPs and journalists. He enlisted some top former cricketers like Mohammad Azharuddin to play against journalists.
But when journalists asked him to let out Feroze Shah Kotla Ground for this match, he refused to oblige saying he wouldn’t want to spoil the pitch. And this comment became a big subject of discussion in the media when the India-Sri Lanka match was scrapped because of the condition of the pitch.
Sajjan Kumar’s lunch for farmers
Congress strongman from outer Delhi Sajjan Kumar is a man who never says die. Ever since he was implicated in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots, he has often been denied the party ticket and forced to sit out, but he has not lost his zest and zing.
Every year he organises a lunch, all vegetarian, for farmers and invites almost every known and unknown media person. This year too he remained unfazed and invited all to his 16, Ashoka Road residence.
Through a strange coincidence the luncheon invitation arrived in media offices almost simultaneously with the news from the Union Home Ministry that it has extracted from Delhi’s Lt. Governor Tejinder Khanna the sanction to prosecute Sajjan Kumar for his alleged involvement in the 1984 riots.
Ministers reluctant to go to Africa
It turned out to be quite a herculean task for the government to find a Minister of State to travel as the Minister-in-Waiting with Vice-President Hamid Ansari on his coming three-nation tour of Africa.
The Prime Minster’s Office contacted almost every MoS, seeking his/her consent for accompanying the Vice-President. Finally, Minister of State for Labour Harish Rawat reluctantly agreed to go on the trip during which several agreements are expected to be signed by India with Zambia, Malawi and Botswana.n
Contributed by Anita Katyal, Faraz Ahmad and Ashok Tuteja

Source: The Tribune, Chandigarh, India.
If you are interested to read about India and its history, check the following:


Watchdogs must get smarter by James Moore

THE chairman of the US Federal Reserve has blamed poor financial regulation for the financial crisis and defended the record of America's central bank. Ben Bernanke also called for urgent improvements to financial oversight to prevent a repeat of an economic storm that he said could ultimately prove to be "the worst in history".
In a speech to the American Economic Association in Atlanta, Georgia on Sunday Mr Bernanke argued that low interest rates in the first five years of the new millennium were "appropriate" for the time and had not caused the "bubble" in US house prices.
The Fed has been criticised by some economists who argue that it kept rates too low for too long, encouraging the property boom. The subsequent crash led to a surge in repossessions, leaving lenders with huge losses and the financial contagion quickly spread around the world.
Mr Bernanke suggested that the bubble was inflated by poor mortgage underwriting and weak supervision of lenders, and he said this must change.
"Surely, both the private sector and the financial regulators must improve their ability to monitor and control risk-taking," he added. "The crisis revealed not only weaknesses in regulators' oversight of financial institutions but also, more fundamentally, important gaps in the architecture of financial regulation around the world.
"Stronger regulation and supervision aimed at problems with (mortgage) underwriting practices and lenders' risk management would have been a more effective and surgical approach to constraining the housing bubble than a general increase in interest rates.
"Moreover, regulators, supervisors and the private sector could have more effectively addressed building risk concentrations and inadequate risk-management practices without necessarily having had to make a judgement about the sustainability of house prices."
Mr Bernanke insisted the Federal Reserve had been "working hard to identify problems and to improve and strengthen our supervisory policies and practices", adding: "The lesson I take from this experience is not that financial regulation and supervision are ineffective for controlling emerging risks, but that their execution must be better and smarter."
However, despite his remarks, he said policymakers should not rule out using interest rates as a measure to prevent any future build-up of asset price bubbles. "If adequate reforms are not made, or if they are made but prove insufficient to prevent dangerous build-ups of financial risks, we must remain open to using monetary policy as a supplementary tool for addressing those risks," he explained.
"Clearly, we still have much to learn about how best to make monetary policy and to meet threats to financial stability in this new era."
Mr Bernanke's speech comes as the US Senate prepares to debate regulatory reforms that would remove the Fed's responsibility for overseeing large financial institutions and leave it to focus on interest rates, a move that has already happened in Britain. Here, the Conservative Party has pledged to reverse this policy and return to the Bank of England its responsibility for supervising lenders.
Mr Bernanke has argued against the Senate's move, saying it would damage oversight of the system by removing a crucial monitor. The Fed chairman, who took office in February 2006 following the long reign of Alan Greenspan, has been nominated for another term by President Obama. The Senate Banking Committee voted in his favour last month and, while his nomination remains contentious with some, it is expected to be confirmed.
By arrangement with The Independent

Source: The Tribune, Chandigarh, India.
If you are interested to read about India and its history, check the following: